<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC HD &#8211; Freeview/Freesat: You can&#8217;t get a quart into a pint pot!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.getoffyoursoapbox.co.uk/2009/12/15/bbc-hd-freeviewfreesat-you-cant-get-a-quart-into-a-pint-pot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.getoffyoursoapbox.co.uk/2009/12/15/bbc-hd-freeviewfreesat-you-cant-get-a-quart-into-a-pint-pot/</link>
	<description>A Great British Blog: Having a rant and rave about the very best and worst of life in Britain.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:18:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Simon04</title>
		<link>http://www.getoffyoursoapbox.co.uk/2009/12/15/bbc-hd-freeviewfreesat-you-cant-get-a-quart-into-a-pint-pot/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon04</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 20:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getoffyoursoapbox.co.uk/?p=922#comment-154</guid>
		<description>What about option 5?

Option 5.  Get rid of all the +1 channels and free up loads of bandwidth. These channels are practically useless - if you want to watch a digital broadcast later, record it. People have been recording for years, and modern recorders timeslip to boot. The latest sets even record without the need for a separate PVR. Get real, get rid of +1s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about option 5?</p>
<p>Option 5.  Get rid of all the +1 channels and free up loads of bandwidth. These channels are practically useless &#8211; if you want to watch a digital broadcast later, record it. People have been recording for years, and modern recorders timeslip to boot. The latest sets even record without the need for a separate PVR. Get real, get rid of +1s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarkStar111S</title>
		<link>http://www.getoffyoursoapbox.co.uk/2009/12/15/bbc-hd-freeviewfreesat-you-cant-get-a-quart-into-a-pint-pot/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>DarkStar111S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getoffyoursoapbox.co.uk/?p=922#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I just posted this on the BBC HD Blog, but in the event it is removed;

Now here&#039;s a funny thing;

http://www.linowsat.co.uk/0282/bitrate/205010847.html

The above shows that the multiplex on the satellite transponder chosen to emit BBC-HD has no less than 8 Mb/s of &#039;bit-stuffing&#039;, these are null bytes sent to &#039;fill&#039; unused capacity in the stream.

So, why would the BBC ? Choose to;

a. Stuff the mux with 8Mb/s of null packets.

b. Continue to use DVB-S (which has 30% less capacity than DVB-S2) on this transponder, when most broadcasters around the World use DVB-S2 and have been for 3 years.

I think we all know the answer.

A DVB-T2 terrestrial carrier can only deliver 36Mb/s at best and the BBC must make terrestrial FreeView-HD happen, for their very lives, so satellite delivery is crippled to make it appear &#039;identical&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just posted this on the BBC HD Blog, but in the event it is removed;</p>
<p>Now here&#8217;s a funny thing;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.linowsat.co.uk/0282/bitrate/205010847.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.linowsat.co.uk/0282/bitrate/205010847.html</a></p>
<p>The above shows that the multiplex on the satellite transponder chosen to emit BBC-HD has no less than 8 Mb/s of &#8216;bit-stuffing&#8217;, these are null bytes sent to &#8216;fill&#8217; unused capacity in the stream.</p>
<p>So, why would the BBC ? Choose to;</p>
<p>a. Stuff the mux with 8Mb/s of null packets.</p>
<p>b. Continue to use DVB-S (which has 30% less capacity than DVB-S2) on this transponder, when most broadcasters around the World use DVB-S2 and have been for 3 years.</p>
<p>I think we all know the answer.</p>
<p>A DVB-T2 terrestrial carrier can only deliver 36Mb/s at best and the BBC must make terrestrial FreeView-HD happen, for their very lives, so satellite delivery is crippled to make it appear &#8216;identical&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
